Why Agile Project Management Is Better Than Waterfall?
3 minutes, 35 seconds
Your article has been created in English language
AnirudhOS ✓ Waterfall ✓ Yoast
Another interesting fact to note is, with the increase of Agile project management, the usage of the conventional Waterfall methodology saw a steady decline. The customer has frequent and early opportunities to assess the work being delivered and make decisions & changes throughout the development life cycle. If the time to market for a specific application is a greater concern than releasing a full feature set at initial launch, Agile can more quickly produce a basic version of a working software which can be built upon in successive iterations.
Project managementProject management triangleProject Management ProfessionalProject Management Body of KnowledgeProject management officeProject Management Institute
Text downloadPDF download
though agile methodology was present more than a decade ago, the vast majority of organizations adopted the practice in the last five years. Moreover, a survey reported that agile adoption saw a sudden rise in between the year 2009-2010. Agile adoption has shown an incremental growth till 2008 and then its growth was accelerated after gaining traction in the market. If you are running a complex project, it is advisable to use agile project management as the methodology. complex projects contain several interconnected stages, where a change in one stage can affect another. So, project managers use Agile methodology in such a scenario, as there is a chance of high adaptability. identify Benefits of Agile project management: Improves collaboration among teams- 54% Enhances the quality level of software in organizations- 52% outcome in enhanced customer satisfaction- 49% Speeds time to market- 43%Reduces development cost- 42%Why Agile is better than Waterfall? Another interesting fact to note is, with the increase of Agile project management, the usage of the conventional Waterfall methodology saw a steady decline. The Waterfall Model is more about a process, where one can see progress “flowing” through different phases. It’s a sequential model which goes from requirement analysis, design, implementation, testing, and production to maintenance. When Agile is the base of development, it tends to deliver visibility, adaptability, accountability, and value at the beginning of the process and minimizes the risks during the project. If you are a part of the software development industry, I am sure you know how project plans change every day according to the customer needs! waterfall method, being sequential in its approach cannot adapt to the frequent change of project scope. On the other hand, agile project management employs an iterative approach and is highly adaptable to frequent changes. Advantages of Agile over waterfall are: Agile techniques virtually eliminate the chances of absolute project failure. Agile means always having a working product which is being built incrementally right from the very first sprint, so that projects do not fail completely. The customer has frequent and early opportunities to assess the work being delivered and make decisions & changes throughout the development life cycle. Waterfall doesn’t involve customers in the projects. agile project management results in far less re-work on projects as issues and changes are identified in the early stages itself. Since, Waterfall doesn’t have an iterative approach; there is a high possibility of re-work after delivery or completion of a major feature or milestone. Agile involves frequent check-ins and demonstrations with the stakeholders which allows for changes to be made at a much faster pace, which is good news for smaller teams– letting them get feedback faster and making it easier for them to adjust to the wants and needs of the customer. As mentioned earlier, Waterfall doesn’t encourage the involvement of Customer. so there is less possibility of getting feedback from customers and the team. Thus, Waterfall is less likely to be customer centric. If the time to market for a specific application is a greater concern than releasing a full feature set at initial launch, Agile can more quickly produce a basic version of a working software which can be built upon in successive iterations. In the Agile development, testing is done at the sprint level to ensure that the project is delivered in an optimum state. It enables the project managers to perform changes if needed and the team is aware of potential issues beforehand. In Waterfall, there is no chance of iterative testing which makes projects prone to failure. The advantage of Agile methodology is that when companies take time on the front end during planning a project using Agile techniques, they can predict the cost of a project to conclude whether or not they should continue with the project. There is also a possibility of high ROI in Agile than Waterfall project management. Because of Agile’s iterative and customer-first approach, surveys show, 49% of the agile projects are successful. However, this percentage is restricted to 14% in Waterfall. in waterfall, value delivery comes at the end of the development process. If the project exceeds the agreed budget – which is very likely in the case of IT contracts, there may be no time and money left to deliver the value that was agreed upon with the client. This free text article has been written automatically with the Text Generator Software https://www.artikelschreiber.com/en/ - Try it for yourself!